You mean, studying 1-to-1 is necessarily teacher-centered and bad or studying 1-to-1 qualified as pairwork is necessarily teacher-centered and bad? ๐
But don’t tell me that YOU think that 1-to-1 teaching is bad.
๐ I guess I have been reading too much lately. Collaborative learning is a buzz word in e-learning. They keep saying that studying in a group is better than studying on your own, so I wonder where studying 1-to-1 fits in this paradigm. I am all for tutored self-study, but it is not independent self-study, there are two people. And my logic tells me that it is a variety of pairwork, where one of the conversation partners is more knowledgeable. The bad news is that I can’t find any nice quote to support my view ๐
I couldn’t agree more, but still I presume that studying 1-to-1 is not pair work. On the one hand, a teacher is more skilful, and, on the other hand, a teacher is not a peer. What I am trying to say is that his/her function is rather to keep track of student’s progress than to be a partner. If you run after two hares, you will catch neither. All the same, it is the best mode of study provided it is not totally on-line.
As for what your teacher’s function is, it all depends on your cultural learning style (expectations and ideas as to what it is the teacher should or should not do – I wrote about cultural learning styles here http://www.englishlab.net/teflblog/2008/11/what-learning-styles-are-there/ ), the subject matter of what you are studying, and the methodology. There are quite a few approaches, methods and techniques out there that provide for student-centered teaching.
What I am personally pondering now is the scope of the term “pairwork”. The thing is that pairwork is part of 1-to-1 teaching, but 1-to-1 teaching is not limited to it. Perhaps that’s what I ought to consider the starting point in my quest for more knowledge ๐
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok
You mean, studying 1-to-1 is necessarily teacher-centered and bad or studying 1-to-1 qualified as pairwork is necessarily teacher-centered and bad? ๐
But don’t tell me that YOU think that 1-to-1 teaching is bad.
๐ I guess I have been reading too much lately. Collaborative learning is a buzz word in e-learning. They keep saying that studying in a group is better than studying on your own, so I wonder where studying 1-to-1 fits in this paradigm. I am all for tutored self-study, but it is not independent self-study, there are two people. And my logic tells me that it is a variety of pairwork, where one of the conversation partners is more knowledgeable. The bad news is that I can’t find any nice quote to support my view ๐
I couldn’t agree more, but still I presume that studying 1-to-1 is not pair work. On the one hand, a teacher is more skilful, and, on the other hand, a teacher is not a peer. What I am trying to say is that his/her function is rather to keep track of student’s progress than to be a partner. If you run after two hares, you will catch neither. All the same, it is the best mode of study provided it is not totally on-line.
As for what your teacher’s function is, it all depends on your cultural learning style (expectations and ideas as to what it is the teacher should or should not do – I wrote about cultural learning styles here http://www.englishlab.net/teflblog/2008/11/what-learning-styles-are-there/ ), the subject matter of what you are studying, and the methodology. There are quite a few approaches, methods and techniques out there that provide for student-centered teaching.
What I am personally pondering now is the scope of the term “pairwork”. The thing is that pairwork is part of 1-to-1 teaching, but 1-to-1 teaching is not limited to it. Perhaps that’s what I ought to consider the starting point in my quest for more knowledge ๐